Archive for September, 2011

Policy Brief—The Value of Energy Performance and Green Attributes in Buildings

 Posted by Allan on September 27th, 2011

A new policy brief on the value of energy performance and green attributes in buildings, authored by Elizabeth Stuart, is available.

Labels, certifications, and rating systems for energy efficiency performance and “green” attributes of buildings have been available in the U.S. for over 10 years, and used extensively in the European Union and Australia for longer. Such certifications and ratings can make energy efficiency more visible, and could help spur demand for energy efficiency if these designations are shown to have a positive impact on sales or rental prices. This policy brief discusses the findings and methodologies from recent studies on this topic, and suggests recommendations for future research. Although there have been just a handful of studies within the last 10 years that have investigated these effects, a few key findings have emerged.

Download “The Value of Energy Performance and Green Attributes in Buildings: A Review of Existing Literature and Recommendations for Future Research.”

Download at http://eetd.lbl.gov/EAP/EMP/reports/ee-policybrief_090711.pdf

NASA Partners with DOE to Construct ‘Greenest’ Federal Building

 Posted by Allan on September 22nd, 2011

NASA-Ames sent the following press release today.

MOFFETT FIELD, Calif. – NASA’s Ames Research Center and the Department of Energy (DOE), at the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, Calif. are collaborating on technologies and processes for what may be the “greenest,” highest-performing building in the federal government.

Originally developed for aerospace applications, NASA intelligent system software will be installed in the new building, called Sustainability Base, by Ames engineers. These NASA-developed control and Integrated Systems Health Management (ISHM) technologies will be an integral part of the building. To help integrate these “smart system” technologies, the Building Technologies Department at Berkeley Lab developed a Building Information Model (BIM) to serve as the repository for the building’s systems information during its life cycle. Using data from the BIM, Berkeley Lab developed an energy-performance simulation model to optimize the building’s energy operations.

Read the rest: http://www.nasa.gov/centers/ames/news/releases/2011/11-72AR.html

Advanced Battery Technology Awarded $240,000 UC Discovery Grant

 Posted by Allan on September 16th, 2011

A technology with the potential to increase the lithium-ion storage capacity of advanced batteries by eight times has been awarded a $240,000 grant from the University of California’s Discovery proof-of-concept grant program to accelerate its entrance into the marketplace. This project is led by Gao Liu (Principal Investigator) and Vince Battaglia (co-PI) in the Environmental Energy Technologies Division.

Developed by Gao Liu, the technology is a conductive polymer binder that significantly improves the performance of electrodes in silicon composite electrodes. Silicon is a high energy-capacity material for negative electrodes that also has a long life cycle in batteries. Lithium ion batteries with silicon electrodes could have up to 25 percent higher energy storage capacity than current batteries, and longer product lifetime through many cycles of charging and discharging.

Given equivalent vehicle weight, this means that an electric vehicle could travel 25 percent farther on one charge. The technology could potentially lead to EVs with a 250-mile per charge range.

The promise of silicon as an electrode

“Silicon is a very promising material as a negative electrode [anode] for batteries,” says Liu. “ It has ten times the capacity of graphite. The problem is that silicon is not stable. Its volume increases and decreases as electric charge travels to and from the electrode.”

With existing binders, the pathway of the electric current will breach as the silicon expands, preventing the charges from moving—like the breaking of an electrical circuit.

“Our conductive polymer binder is very effective in lithium-ion batteries,” says Liu. “As it expands and contracts, it holds the silicon particles together, maintaining the conductive path.”

“The conductive polymer binder,” adds Liu, “ can not only be used with our silicon electrode, but with other battery chemistries and technologies as well. Many other battery-related applications are possible with this binder.”

The research work that led to the technology has been funded by the Battery for Advanced Transportation Technologies program (BATT) of Office of Vehicle Technologies, U.S. Department of Energy. The BATT program continues to fund the basic research.

The UC Discovery Fund is designed for technologies that have already demonstrated successful results in the research environment and are poised for commercialization but are in need of a specific, targeted demonstration, test result, or prototype.

Technology Transfer Department Helps Identify Marketplace Barriers

The Technology Transfer Department’s Shanshan Li worked closely with Liu to clarify the potential market applications and barriers to commercialization, as well as develop tangible development milestones that will most likely attract commercial interest to license the technology.

“The technology has generated high-profile interest from battery manufacturers, suppliers, and investors,” says Li. “But we identified two primary barriers to commercialization: providing a large quantity of samples for testing, and optimizing the performance of the electrode in battery systems. The UC Discovery proof-of-concept grant serves an important role in making the lab to market transition of this technology possible.”

Unlike the other UC Discovery grants, the proof-of-concept program does not require matching industry funds. However, for Berkeley Lab researchers, applying for the grant would have been impractical because the fund only covers the direct cost of research. In collaboration with Berkeley Lab leadership, The Technology Transfer Department found a way to use the licensing royalty funds to cover the indirect cost, making it possible for Berkeley Lab researchers like Liu to apply.

Read the UC Discovery Grant press release here: http://www.universityofcalifornia.edu/news/article/26297

For more information on the technologies, “conductive binder for lithium ion battery electrode” and “silicon composite electrode for advanced lithium ion batteries,” see:
http://www.lbl.gov/Tech-Transfer/techs/lbnl2643,2890.html

Read a story about proof-of-concept grants here.
http://research.universityofcalifornia.edu/stories/2011/09/proof-concept-grants.html

 

Technical contact: Gao Liu, gliu@lbl.gov
Technology Transfer Department: 510-486-5366,  shanshanli@lbl.gov

The Installed Cost of Solar Photovoltaic Systems in the U.S. Declined Significantly in 2010 and 2011

 Posted by Allan on September 15th, 2011

Berkeley, CA — The installed cost of solar photovoltaic (PV) power systems in the United States fell substantially in 2010 and into the first half of 2011, according to the latest edition of an annual PV cost tracking report released by the Department of Energy’s Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab).

The average installed cost of residential and commercial PV systems completed in 2010 fell by roughly 17 percent from the year before, and by an additional 11 percent within the first six months of 2011. These recent installed cost reductions are attributable, in part, to dramatic reductions in the price of PV modules. Galen Barbose of Berkeley Lab’s Environmental Energy Technologies Division and co-author of the report explains, “Wholesale PV module prices have fallen precipitously since about 2008, and those upstream cost reductions have made their way through to consumers.”

The report indicates that non-module costs – such as installation labor, marketing, overhead, inverters, and the balance of systems – also fell for residential and commercial PV systems in 2010. “The drop in non-module costs is especially important,” notes report co-author Ryan Wiser, “as those are the costs that can be most readily influenced by solar policies aimed at accelerating deployment and removing market barriers, as opposed to research and development programs that are also aimed at reducing module costs.” According to the report, average non-module costs for residential and commercial systems declined by roughly 18 percent from 2009 to 2010.

Turning to utility-sector PV, costs varied over a wide range for systems installed in 2010, with the cost of systems greater than 5,000 kilowatts (kW) ranging from $2.90 per Watt (W) to $6.20/W, reflecting differences in project size and system configuration, as well as the unique characteristics of certain individual projects. Consistent with continued cost reductions, current benchmarks for the installed cost of prototypical, large utility-scale PV projects generally range from $3.80/W to $4.40/W.

The market for solar PV systems in the United States has grown rapidly over the past decade, as national, state and local governments offered various incentives to expand the solar market and accelerate cost reductions. The study–the fourth in Berkeley Lab’s “Tracking the Sun” report series–describes trends in the installed cost of PV in the United States, and examined more than 115,000 residential, commercial, and utility-sector PV systems installed between 1998 and 2010 across 42 states, representing roughly 78 percent of all grid-connected PV capacity installed in the United States. Naïm Darghouth, also with Berkeley Lab, explains that “the study is intended to provide policy makers and industry observers with a reliable and detailed set of historical benchmarks for tracking and understanding past trends in the installed cost of PV.”

Costs Differ by Region and by Size and Type of System

The study also highlights differences in installed costs by region and by system size and installation type. Comparing across U.S. states, for example, the average cost of PV systems installed in 2010 and less than 10 kilowatts (kW) in size ranged from $6.30/W to $8.40/W depending on the state. The report also found that residential PV systems installed on new homes had significantly lower average installed costs than those installed as retrofits to existing homes.

Based on these data and on installed cost data from the sizable German and Japanese PV markets, the authors suggest that PV costs may be driven lower through large-scale deployment programs, but that other factors are also important in achieving cost reductions.

The report also shows that PV installed costs exhibit significant economies of scale. Among systems installed in 2010, those smaller than 2 kW averaged $9.80/W, while large commercial systems >1,000 kW averaged $5.20/W; partial-year data for 2011 suggests that average costs declined even further in 2011. Large utility-sector systems installed in 2010 registered even lower costs, with a number of systems in the $3.00/W to $4.00/W range.

Cost Declines for PV System Owners in 2010 Were Partially Offset by Falling Incentives

The average size of direct cash incentives provided through state and utility PV incentive programs has declined steadily since their peak in 2002. The dollar-per-Watt benefit of the federal investment tax credit (ITC) and Treasury grant in lieu of the ITC, which are based on a percentage of installed cost, also fell in 2010 as a result of the drop in average installed costs.

The reduced value of federal, state, and utility incentives in 2010 partially offset the decline in installed costs. Therefore, while pre-incentive installed costs fell by $1.00/W and $1.50/W for residential and commercial PV in 2010, respectively, the decline in “net” (or post-incentive) installed costs fell by $0.40/W for residential PV and by $0.80/W for commercial PV.

The report “Tracking the Sun IV: An Historical Summary of the Installed Cost of Photovoltaics in the United States from 1998 to 2010,” by Galen Barbose, Naïm Darghouth, and Ryan Wiser, may be downloaded from http://eetd.lbl.gov/ea/emp/reports/lbnl-5047e.pdf .

The research was supported by funding from the U.S. Department of Energy’s Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy and by the Clean Energy States Alliance, a national nonprofit coalition of leading state clean energy programs that work together to advance renewable energy project deployment in their states and across the country.

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory addresses the world’s most urgent scientific challenges by advancing sustainable energy, protecting human health, creating new materials, and revealing the origin and fate of the universe. Founded in 1931, Berkeley Lab’s scientific expertise has been recognized with 12 Nobel prizes. The University of California manages Berkeley Lab for the U.S. Department of Energy’s Office of Science. For more, visit www.lbl.gov.

http://newscenter.lbl.gov/news-releases/2011/09/15/tracking-the-sun-iv/